Head-to-Head Analysis

ORGANIC Chicken thighs vs Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of ORGANIC Chicken thighs

ORGANIC Chicken thighs

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry

Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
116 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
22.5g
4g
Fat
15g
19.6g
Protein
15g
0.2g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ORGANIC Chicken thighs and Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, ORGANIC Chicken thighs is the clear winner. With 284 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, ORGANIC Chicken thighs takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry contains 22.5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? ORGANIC Chicken thighs offers a protein boost with 19.6g per 100g, outperforming Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ORGANIC Chicken thighs or Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry?

ORGANIC Chicken thighs appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is ORGANIC Chicken thighs vegan?

No, ORGANIC Chicken thighs is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ORGANIC Chicken thighs and Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry?

There is a difference of 284 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.