Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes vs Chupa Chups

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes

Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chupa Chups

Chupa Chups

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
16.1g
Fat
0g
14.3g
Protein
0g
1.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes and Chupa Chups side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes is the more energy-dense option here, packing 464 more calories per 100g than Chupa Chups. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes contains significantly more sugar (3.5714285714286g) compared to the milder Chupa Chups (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chupa Chups is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes offers a protein boost with 14.285714285714g per 100g, outperforming Chupa Chups in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes or Chupa Chups?

It depends on your goals. Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes has 464.28571428571 calories, while Chupa Chups has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes vegan?

No, Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Chickpea Puffs, Vegan Nacho Vibes and Chupa Chups?

There is a difference of 464 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.