Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter vs SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter

Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter

Not Vegan
VS
Package of SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT

SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
714 kcal
Energy
536 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
10.7g
64.3g
Fat
32.1g
7.1g
Protein
3.6g
0g
Salt
1.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter and SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter is the more energy-dense option here, packing 178 more calories per 100g than SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter takes the lead with only 7.14g of sugar per 100g, whereas SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT contains 10.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter or SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT?

It depends on your goals. Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter has 714 calories, while SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT has 536 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter vegan?

No, Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Coconut Manna Coconut Butter and SWEET POTATO CHIPS SEA SALT?

There is a difference of 178 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.