Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) vs Chicken with Rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free)

Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free)

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chicken with Rice

Chicken with Rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
110 kcal
Energy
66.7 kcal
9g
Sugars
0g
3.5g
Fat
1.7g
0g
Protein
1.7g
0.3g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) and Chicken with Rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 43 more calories per 100g than Chicken with Rice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) contains significantly more sugar (9g) compared to the milder Chicken with Rice (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chicken with Rice is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) or Chicken with Rice?

It depends on your goals. Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) has 110 calories, while Chicken with Rice has 66.67 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) vegan?

No, Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Creamy Tomato Soup (Low Sodium, Gluten Free) and Chicken with Rice?

There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.