Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks vs Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks

Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites

Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
350 kcal
Energy
432 kcal
25g
Sugars
21.6g
10g
Fat
16.2g
5g
Protein
8.1g
0.9g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks and Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks is the clear winner. With 82 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites (21.6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks or Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites?

It depends on your goals. Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks has 350 calories, while Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites has 432 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks vegan?

No, Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Crunchin' Grahams Honey Sticks and Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Oat Bites?

There is a difference of 82 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.