Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic dark chocolate covered almonds vs Organic Greek Yogis

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic dark chocolate covered almonds

Organic dark chocolate covered almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Greek Yogis

Organic Greek Yogis

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
34.4g
Sugars
0g
37.5g
Fat
0g
9.4g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic dark chocolate covered almonds and Organic Greek Yogis side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic dark chocolate covered almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 500 more calories per 100g than Organic Greek Yogis. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic dark chocolate covered almonds contains significantly more sugar (34.4g) compared to the milder Organic Greek Yogis (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Greek Yogis is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic dark chocolate covered almonds offers a protein boost with 9.38g per 100g, outperforming Organic Greek Yogis in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic dark chocolate covered almonds or Organic Greek Yogis?

It depends on your goals. Organic dark chocolate covered almonds has 500 calories, while Organic Greek Yogis has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic dark chocolate covered almonds vegan?

No, Organic dark chocolate covered almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic dark chocolate covered almonds and Organic Greek Yogis?

There is a difference of 500 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.