Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa vs Low fat oat milk

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Low fat oat milk

Low fat oat milk

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
513.5 kcal
Energy
90 kcal
32.4g
Sugars
7g
35.1g
Fat
1g
8.1g
Protein
3g
0g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa and Low fat oat milk side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa is the more energy-dense option here, packing 424 more calories per 100g than Low fat oat milk. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa contains significantly more sugar (32.43g) compared to the milder Low fat oat milk (7g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Low fat oat milk is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa offers a protein boost with 8.11g per 100g, outperforming Low fat oat milk in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa or Low fat oat milk?

It depends on your goals. Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa has 513.51 calories, while Low fat oat milk has 90 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa vegan?

No, Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Dark Hazelnut Spread With Cocoa and Low fat oat milk?

There is a difference of 424 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.