Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic dark sweet cherries vs Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic dark sweet cherries

Organic dark sweet cherries

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel

Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
64.3 kcal
Energy
417 kcal
11.4g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
12.5g
0.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic dark sweet cherries and Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic dark sweet cherries is the clear winner. With 353 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic dark sweet cherries contains significantly more sugar (11.4g) compared to the milder Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic dark sweet cherries or Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel?

It depends on your goals. Organic dark sweet cherries has 64.3 calories, while Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel has 417 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic dark sweet cherries vegan?

No, Organic dark sweet cherries is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic dark sweet cherries and Rice Krispies Treats Bliss Caramel Sea Salt Pretzel?

There is a difference of 353 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.