Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic drinking chocolate vs BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic drinking chocolate

Organic drinking chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE

BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
54.2 kcal
63.3g
Sugars
10.8g
3.3g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0.4g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic drinking chocolate and BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic drinking chocolate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 313 more calories per 100g than BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic drinking chocolate contains significantly more sugar (63.33g) compared to the milder BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE (10.8g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic drinking chocolate offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic drinking chocolate or BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE?

It depends on your goals. Organic drinking chocolate has 367 calories, while BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE has 54.2 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic drinking chocolate vegan?

No, Organic drinking chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic drinking chocolate and BOOSTED SMOOTHIE GREEN MACHINE?

There is a difference of 313 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.