Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic green superfoods powder original vs True lime black cherry limeade count

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic green superfoods powder original

Organic green superfoods powder original

Not Vegan
VS
Package of True lime black cherry limeade count

True lime black cherry limeade count

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
333.3 kcal
7.1g
Sugars
33.3g
0g
Fat
0g
7.1g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic green superfoods powder original and True lime black cherry limeade count side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic green superfoods powder original is the clear winner. With 47 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Organic green superfoods powder original takes the lead with only 7.14g of sugar per 100g, whereas True lime black cherry limeade count contains 33.333333333333g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic green superfoods powder original offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming True lime black cherry limeade count in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic green superfoods powder original or True lime black cherry limeade count?

Organic green superfoods powder original appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Organic green superfoods powder original vegan?

No, Organic green superfoods powder original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic green superfoods powder original and True lime black cherry limeade count?

There is a difference of 47 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.