Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup vs Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup

Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans

Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
37.5 kcal
Energy
123 kcal
4.2g
Sugars
3g
0.2g
Fat
8.1g
0.8g
Protein
5.1g
0.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup and Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup is the clear winner. With 85 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup contains significantly more sugar (4.17g) compared to the milder Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans (2.97g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup or Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans?

It depends on your goals. Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup has 37.5 calories, while Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans has 123 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup vegan?

No, Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Light In Sodium Creamy Garden Tomato Soup and Stagg, Beef Chili No Beans?

There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.