Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds vs Tortilla triangles

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds

Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tortilla triangles

Tortilla triangles

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
415 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
21.5g
Sugars
0g
15.4g
Fat
25g
15.4g
Protein
7.1g
0.1g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds and Tortilla triangles side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds is the clear winner. With 85 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds contains significantly more sugar (21.5g) compared to the milder Tortilla triangles (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tortilla triangles is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds offers a protein boost with 15.4g per 100g, outperforming Tortilla triangles in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds or Tortilla triangles?

It depends on your goals. Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds has 415 calories, while Tortilla triangles has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds vegan?

No, Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Macrobar Dark Chocolate + Almonds and Tortilla triangles?

There is a difference of 85 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.