Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate vs ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate

Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT

ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
415 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
10.8g
Sugars
0g
12.3g
Fat
40g
15.4g
Protein
20g
0.1g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate and ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate is the clear winner. With 185 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate contains significantly more sugar (10.8g) compared to the milder ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate or ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT?

It depends on your goals. Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate has 415 calories, while ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT has 600 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate vegan?

No, Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Macrobar Sunflower Butter + Chocolate and ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT?

There is a difference of 185 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.