Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic milk chocolate bar vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic milk chocolate bar

Organic milk chocolate bar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
566.7 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
46.7g
Sugars
6g
33.3g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic milk chocolate bar and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic milk chocolate bar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 307 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic milk chocolate bar contains significantly more sugar (46.6667g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic milk chocolate bar offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic milk chocolate bar or Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. Organic milk chocolate bar has 566.6667 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic milk chocolate bar vegan?

No, Organic milk chocolate bar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic milk chocolate bar and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 307 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.