Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy vs crème de coco Kokos

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy

Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of crème de coco Kokos

crème de coco Kokos

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
562.5 kcal
Energy
222 kcal
9.4g
Sugars
2.2g
50g
Fat
22.2g
25g
Protein
2.2g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy and crème de coco Kokos side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy is the more energy-dense option here, packing 341 more calories per 100g than crème de coco Kokos. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy contains significantly more sugar (9.38g) compared to the milder crème de coco Kokos (2.22g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, crème de coco Kokos is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming crème de coco Kokos in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy or crème de coco Kokos?

It depends on your goals. Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy has 562.5 calories, while crème de coco Kokos has 222 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy vegan?

No, Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic No Stir Peanut Butter Crunchy and crème de coco Kokos?

There is a difference of 341 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.