Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt vs Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt

Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
70.8 kcal
Energy
357.1 kcal
5.4g
Sugars
0g
2.9g
Fat
28.6g
1.3g
Protein
25g
0g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt and Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt contains significantly more sugar (5.4166666666667g) compared to the milder Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt or Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese?

It depends on your goals. Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt has 70.833333333333 calories, while Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese has 357.14 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt vegan?

No, Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Probiotic Blueberry Cashewmilk Yogurt and Semi Soft Part-Skim Cheese?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.