Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats vs Organic Orange Mango Beverage

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats

Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Organic Orange Mango Beverage

Organic Orange Mango Beverage

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
377.8 kcal
Energy
50 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
10.4g
5.6g
Fat
0g
13.3g
Protein
0.4g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats and Organic Orange Mango Beverage side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats is the more energy-dense option here, packing 328 more calories per 100g than Organic Orange Mango Beverage. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats takes the lead with only 2.2222222222222g of sugar per 100g, whereas Organic Orange Mango Beverage contains 10.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats offers a protein boost with 13.333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Organic Orange Mango Beverage in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats or Organic Orange Mango Beverage?

It depends on your goals. Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats has 377.77777777778 calories, while Organic Orange Mango Beverage has 50 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats vegan?

No, Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Quick Cooking Rolled Oats and Organic Orange Mango Beverage?

There is a difference of 328 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.