Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Raw Almonds vs Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Raw Almonds

Organic Raw Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal

Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
353 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
11.8g
50g
Fat
5.9g
20g
Protein
11.8g
0g
Salt
1.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Raw Almonds and Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Raw Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 214 more calories per 100g than Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Raw Almonds takes the lead with only 3.33g of sugar per 100g, whereas Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal contains 11.76g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Raw Almonds offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Raw Almonds or Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal?

It depends on your goals. Organic Raw Almonds has 567 calories, while Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal has 353 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Raw Almonds vegan?

No, Organic Raw Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Raw Almonds and Lower Sugar Maple & Brown Sugar Instant Oatmeal?

There is a difference of 214 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.