Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Roasted Beef Base vs Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Roasted Beef Base

Organic Roasted Beef Base

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa

Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
48.4 kcal
16.7g
Sugars
3.2g
16.7g
Fat
0g
16.7g
Protein
0g
29.2g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Roasted Beef Base and Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Roasted Beef Base is the more energy-dense option here, packing 202 more calories per 100g than Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Roasted Beef Base contains significantly more sugar (16.7g) compared to the milder Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa (3.23g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Roasted Beef Base offers a protein boost with 16.7g per 100g, outperforming Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Roasted Beef Base or Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa?

It depends on your goals. Organic Roasted Beef Base has 250 calories, while Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa has 48.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Roasted Beef Base vegan?

No, Organic Roasted Beef Base is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Roasted Beef Base and Tostitos Restaurant Style Salsa?

There is a difference of 202 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.