Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips vs Brownies Chocolate Fudge

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Brownies Chocolate Fudge

Brownies Chocolate Fudge

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
280 kcal
0g
Sugars
24g
25g
Fat
12g
7.1g
Protein
8g
0.6g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips and Brownies Chocolate Fudge side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is the more energy-dense option here, packing 184 more calories per 100g than Brownies Chocolate Fudge. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Brownies Chocolate Fudge contains 24g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips or Brownies Chocolate Fudge?

It depends on your goals. Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips has 464 calories, while Brownies Chocolate Fudge has 280 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips vegan?

No, Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Sea Salt & Lime Restaurant Style Tortilla Chips and Brownies Chocolate Fudge?

There is a difference of 184 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.