Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Sliced California Almonds vs Jalapeno Nacho Slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Sliced California Almonds

Organic Sliced California Almonds

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Jalapeno Nacho Slices

Jalapeno Nacho Slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
567 kcal
Energy
33.3 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
50g
Fat
0g
20g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
3.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Sliced California Almonds and Jalapeno Nacho Slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Sliced California Almonds is the more energy-dense option here, packing 534 more calories per 100g than Jalapeno Nacho Slices. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Sliced California Almonds contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Jalapeno Nacho Slices (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Jalapeno Nacho Slices is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Sliced California Almonds offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Jalapeno Nacho Slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Sliced California Almonds or Jalapeno Nacho Slices?

It depends on your goals. Organic Sliced California Almonds has 567 calories, while Jalapeno Nacho Slices has 33.333333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Sliced California Almonds vegan?

No, Organic Sliced California Almonds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Sliced California Almonds and Jalapeno Nacho Slices?

There is a difference of 534 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.