Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate vs Mango Passion Kombucha

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate

Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Mango Passion Kombucha

Mango Passion Kombucha

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
28.2 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
6.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
0g
0.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate and Mango Passion Kombucha side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate is the more energy-dense option here, packing 28 more calories per 100g than Mango Passion Kombucha. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate contains significantly more sugar (6.48g) compared to the milder Mango Passion Kombucha (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Mango Passion Kombucha is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate or Mango Passion Kombucha?

It depends on your goals. Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate has 28.2 calories, while Mango Passion Kombucha has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate vegan?

No, Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Sparkling Cranberry Pomegranate Yerba Mate and Mango Passion Kombucha?

There is a difference of 28 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.