Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour vs California White Basmati Gourmet Rice

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour

Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour

Not Vegan
VS
Package of California White Basmati Gourmet Rice

California White Basmati Gourmet Rice

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
140 kcal
Energy
355.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.5g
Fat
1.1g
6g
Protein
6.7g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour and California White Basmati Gourmet Rice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour is the clear winner. With 216 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour or California White Basmati Gourmet Rice?

It depends on your goals. Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour has 140 calories, while California White Basmati Gourmet Rice has 355.555555555556 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour vegan?

No, Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Stone Ground Whole Wheat Flour and California White Basmati Gourmet Rice?

There is a difference of 216 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.