Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Sweet Matcha vs Salted dark chcolate walnuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Sweet Matcha

Organic Sweet Matcha

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Salted dark chcolate walnuts

Salted dark chcolate walnuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
400 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
90g
Sugars
28.6g
0g
Fat
39.3g
0g
Protein
10.7g
0g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Sweet Matcha and Salted dark chcolate walnuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Sweet Matcha is the clear winner. With 136 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Sweet Matcha contains significantly more sugar (90g) compared to the milder Salted dark chcolate walnuts (28.571428571429g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Salted dark chcolate walnuts is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Sweet Matcha or Salted dark chcolate walnuts?

It depends on your goals. Organic Sweet Matcha has 400 calories, while Salted dark chcolate walnuts has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Sweet Matcha vegan?

No, Organic Sweet Matcha is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Sweet Matcha and Salted dark chcolate walnuts?

There is a difference of 136 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.