Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic tahini pure ground sesame vs Low sugar concord grape jelly

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic tahini pure ground sesame

Organic tahini pure ground sesame

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Low sugar concord grape jelly

Low sugar concord grape jelly

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
666.7 kcal
Energy
147 kcal
0g
Sugars
29.4g
60g
Fat
0g
26.7g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic tahini pure ground sesame and Low sugar concord grape jelly side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic tahini pure ground sesame is the more energy-dense option here, packing 520 more calories per 100g than Low sugar concord grape jelly. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic tahini pure ground sesame takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Low sugar concord grape jelly contains 29.4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic tahini pure ground sesame offers a protein boost with 26.666666666667g per 100g, outperforming Low sugar concord grape jelly in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic tahini pure ground sesame or Low sugar concord grape jelly?

It depends on your goals. Organic tahini pure ground sesame has 666.66666666667 calories, while Low sugar concord grape jelly has 147 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic tahini pure ground sesame vegan?

No, Organic tahini pure ground sesame is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic tahini pure ground sesame and Low sugar concord grape jelly?

There is a difference of 520 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.