Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies vs ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies

Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT

ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
529.4 kcal
Energy
600 kcal
35.3g
Sugars
0g
23.5g
Fat
40g
5.9g
Protein
20g
1.1g
Salt
2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies and ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies is the clear winner. With 71 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies contains significantly more sugar (35.29g) compared to the milder ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies or ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT?

It depends on your goals. Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies has 529.41 calories, while ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT has 600 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies vegan?

No, Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Thin & Crispy Chocolate Chip Cookies and ROASTED SEAWEED SNACKS SEA SALT?

There is a difference of 71 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.