Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf vs Sugar Land Sweet Tea

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf

Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sugar Land Sweet Tea

Sugar Land Sweet Tea

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
50 kcal
Energy
42.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
11.4g
0g
Fat
0g
33.3g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf and Sugar Land Sweet Tea side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf is the more energy-dense option here, packing 7 more calories per 100g than Sugar Land Sweet Tea. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sugar Land Sweet Tea contains 11.392405063291g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf offers a protein boost with 33.333333333333g per 100g, outperforming Sugar Land Sweet Tea in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf or Sugar Land Sweet Tea?

It depends on your goals. Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf has 50 calories, while Sugar Land Sweet Tea has 42.616033755274 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf vegan?

No, Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Traditional Yerba Mate Loose Leaf and Sugar Land Sweet Tea?

There is a difference of 7 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.