Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend vs Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend

Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios

Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
372 kcal
Energy
533 kcal
0g
Sugars
33.3g
5.8g
Fat
36.7g
14g
Protein
13.3g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend and Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend is the clear winner. With 161 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios contains 33.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend or Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios?

Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend vegan?

No, Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Tri-Color Quinoa Blend and Dark Chocolate Covered Pistachios?

There is a difference of 161 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.