Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Watermelon Kombucha vs Almond original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Watermelon Kombucha

Organic Watermelon Kombucha

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Almond original

Almond original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
12.7 kcal
Energy
25 kcal
3.2g
Sugars
2.9g
0g
Fat
1g
0g
Protein
0.4g
0g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Watermelon Kombucha and Almond original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Watermelon Kombucha is the clear winner. With 12 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Watermelon Kombucha or Almond original?

It depends on your goals. Organic Watermelon Kombucha has 12.685 calories, while Almond original has 25 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Watermelon Kombucha vegan?

No, Organic Watermelon Kombucha is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Watermelon Kombucha and Almond original?

There is a difference of 12 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.