Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic White Corn Tortilla chips vs Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic White Corn Tortilla chips

Organic White Corn Tortilla chips

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies

Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
517 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
31g
25g
Fat
24.1g
7.1g
Protein
3.5g
1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic White Corn Tortilla chips and Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic White Corn Tortilla chips is the clear winner. With 17 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Organic White Corn Tortilla chips takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies contains 31.03g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic White Corn Tortilla chips offers a protein boost with 7.14g per 100g, outperforming Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic White Corn Tortilla chips or Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies?

Organic White Corn Tortilla chips appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Organic White Corn Tortilla chips vegan?

No, Organic White Corn Tortilla chips is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic White Corn Tortilla chips and Famous amos, chocolate chip bite size cookies?

There is a difference of 17 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.