Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie vs Chile Spiced Mango

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie

Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Chile Spiced Mango

Chile Spiced Mango

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
62.1 kcal
Energy
350 kcal
8.5g
Sugars
65g
1.1g
Fat
0g
3.4g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie and Chile Spiced Mango side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie is the clear winner. With 288 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie takes the lead with only 8.47g of sugar per 100g, whereas Chile Spiced Mango contains 65g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie offers a protein boost with 3.39g per 100g, outperforming Chile Spiced Mango in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie or Chile Spiced Mango?

Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie vegan?

No, Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Wild Berry Lowfat Yogurt Probiotics Smoothie and Chile Spiced Mango?

There is a difference of 288 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.