Head-to-Head Analysis

Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue vs California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue

Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium

California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
33.1 kcal
Energy
133.3 kcal
7.5g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
10g
0g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue and California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue is the clear winner. With 100 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue contains significantly more sugar (7.5g) compared to the milder California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue or California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium?

It depends on your goals. Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue has 33.1 calories, while California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium has 133.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue vegan?

No, Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Organic Yerba Mate, Berry Blue and California Ripe Pitted Olives Low Sodium Medium?

There is a difference of 100 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.