Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) vs Peanut butter trees

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)

Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked)

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Peanut butter trees

Peanut butter trees

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
286 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
17.9g
Sugars
47.1g
1.8g
Fat
29.4g
46.4g
Protein
11.8g
4.4g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) and Peanut butter trees side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) is the clear winner. With 214 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) takes the lead with only 17.9g of sugar per 100g, whereas Peanut butter trees contains 47.06g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) offers a protein boost with 46.4g per 100g, outperforming Peanut butter trees in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) or Peanut butter trees?

Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) vegan?

No, Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Beef Jerkey (slow cooked/hickory smoked) and Peanut butter trees?

There is a difference of 214 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.