Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Beef Jerky vs Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Original Beef Jerky

Original Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips

Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
25g
Sugars
7.1g
3.6g
Fat
28.6g
28.6g
Protein
7.1g
4.4g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Beef Jerky and Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Original Beef Jerky is the clear winner. With 286 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Original Beef Jerky contains significantly more sugar (25g) compared to the milder Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips (7.1428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Original Beef Jerky offers a protein boost with 28.6g per 100g, outperforming Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Beef Jerky or Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips?

It depends on your goals. Original Beef Jerky has 250 calories, while Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original Beef Jerky vegan?

No, Original Beef Jerky is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Beef Jerky and Honey Mustard Double Crunch Potato Chips?

There is a difference of 286 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.