Head-to-Head Analysis

Original beef stick meat snacks vs Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Original beef stick meat snacks

Original beef stick meat snacks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix

Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
461.5 kcal
Energy
406 kcal
3.8g
Sugars
59.4g
38.5g
Fat
4.7g
19.2g
Protein
3.1g
4.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original beef stick meat snacks and Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Original beef stick meat snacks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 56 more calories per 100g than Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Original beef stick meat snacks takes the lead with only 3.8462g of sugar per 100g, whereas Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix contains 59.38g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Original beef stick meat snacks offers a protein boost with 19.2308g per 100g, outperforming Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original beef stick meat snacks or Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix?

It depends on your goals. Original beef stick meat snacks has 461.5385 calories, while Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix has 406 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original beef stick meat snacks vegan?

No, Original beef stick meat snacks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original beef stick meat snacks and Betty Crocker Fudge Brownie Mix?

There is a difference of 56 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.