Head-to-Head Analysis

ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES vs Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES

ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
225 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
2.8g
Sugars
0g
9.9g
Fat
0g
12.7g
Protein
0g
1.3g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES and Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES is the more energy-dense option here, packing 225 more calories per 100g than Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES contains significantly more sugar (2.82g) compared to the milder Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES offers a protein boost with 12.7g per 100g, outperforming Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES or Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero?

It depends on your goals. ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES has 225 calories, while Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES vegan?

No, ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between ORIGINAL CHIK'N PATTIES and Grass-Fed Beef Jerky Mango Habanero?

There is a difference of 225 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.