Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Chili With Beans vs Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Original Chili With Beans

Original Chili With Beans

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
141.2 kcal
Energy
4 kcal
2.6g
Sugars
0.4g
4.9g
Fat
0g
8.9g
Protein
0.8g
1.2g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Chili With Beans and Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Original Chili With Beans is the more energy-dense option here, packing 137 more calories per 100g than Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Original Chili With Beans contains significantly more sugar (2.5882352941176g) compared to the milder Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth (0.41g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Original Chili With Beans offers a protein boost with 8.9411764705882g per 100g, outperforming Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Chili With Beans or Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth?

It depends on your goals. Original Chili With Beans has 141.17647058824 calories, while Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth has 4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original Chili With Beans vegan?

No, Original Chili With Beans is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Chili With Beans and Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth?

There is a difference of 137 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.