Head-to-Head Analysis

Original light slaw dressing vs Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Original light slaw dressing

Original light slaw dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole

Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
281.3 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
21.9g
Sugars
0g
21.9g
Fat
0g
0g
Protein
0g
2.7g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original light slaw dressing and Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Original light slaw dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 281 more calories per 100g than Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Original light slaw dressing contains significantly more sugar (21.875g) compared to the milder Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original light slaw dressing or Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole?

It depends on your goals. Original light slaw dressing has 281.25 calories, while Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original light slaw dressing vegan?

No, Original light slaw dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original light slaw dressing and Pineapple Poblano Restaurant-Style Guacamole?

There is a difference of 281 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.