Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D vs Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D

Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack

Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
45.8 kcal
Energy
160 kcal
10g
Sugars
13g
0g
Fat
9g
0.8g
Protein
3g
0g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D and Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D is the clear winner. With 114 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D takes the lead with only 10g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack contains 13g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D or Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack?

Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D vegan?

No, Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Low Pulp Orange Juice With Calcium & Vitamin D and Sweet Kale Chopped Salad Kit Twin Pack?

There is a difference of 114 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.