Head-to-Head Analysis

Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. vs Chao Creamery Original Slices

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding.

Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding.

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Chao Creamery Original Slices

Chao Creamery Original Slices

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
100 kcal
Energy
300 kcal
14.6g
Sugars
0g
1.5g
Fat
22.5g
3.1g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
2.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. and Chao Creamery Original Slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. is the clear winner. With 200 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. contains significantly more sugar (14.6g) compared to the milder Chao Creamery Original Slices (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Chao Creamery Original Slices is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. offers a protein boost with 3.08g per 100g, outperforming Chao Creamery Original Slices in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. or Chao Creamery Original Slices?

It depends on your goals. Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. has 100 calories, while Chao Creamery Original Slices has 300 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. vegan?

No, Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Original Recipe Tapioca Pudding. and Chao Creamery Original Slices?

There is a difference of 200 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.