Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta vs Sweet potato fries
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta
Sweet potato fries
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta and Sweet potato fries side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta is the more energy-dense option here, packing 208 more calories per 100g than Sweet potato fries. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta takes the lead with only 3.57g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet potato fries contains 9.52g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta offers a protein boost with 12.5g per 100g, outperforming Sweet potato fries in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta or Sweet potato fries?
It depends on your goals. Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta has 339 calories, while Sweet potato fries has 131 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta vegan?
No, Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Orzo no. 65, whole wheat pasta and Sweet potato fries?
There is a difference of 208 calories per 100g between the two products.
