Head-to-Head Analysis

Oven Classic Turkey Breast vs Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Oven Classic Turkey Breast

Oven Classic Turkey Breast

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt

Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
429 kcal
1.8g
Sugars
0g
0.9g
Fat
21.4g
21.4g
Protein
7.1g
1.8g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Oven Classic Turkey Breast and Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Oven Classic Turkey Breast is the clear winner. With 322 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Oven Classic Turkey Breast contains significantly more sugar (1.79g) compared to the milder Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Oven Classic Turkey Breast offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Oven Classic Turkey Breast or Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt?

It depends on your goals. Oven Classic Turkey Breast has 107 calories, while Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt has 429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Oven Classic Turkey Breast vegan?

No, Oven Classic Turkey Breast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Oven Classic Turkey Breast and Organic Popcorn, Himalayan Pink Salt?

There is a difference of 322 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.