Head-to-Head Analysis

Pad Thai vs Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Pad Thai

Pad Thai

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor

Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
212 kcal
Energy
333 kcal
11.2g
Sugars
33.3g
4.2g
Fat
3.3g
6.2g
Protein
3.3g
1g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pad Thai and Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Pad Thai is the clear winner. With 121 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Pad Thai takes the lead with only 11.2g of sugar per 100g, whereas Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor contains 33.3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Pad Thai offers a protein boost with 6.22g per 100g, outperforming Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pad Thai or Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor?

Pad Thai appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Pad Thai vegan?

No, Pad Thai is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pad Thai and Soft Australian Licorice Original Flavor?

There is a difference of 121 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.