Head-to-Head Analysis

Paleo Style Coconut Chicken vs Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Paleo Style Coconut Chicken

Paleo Style Coconut Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
129 kcal
Energy
4 kcal
2.9g
Sugars
0.4g
5.7g
Fat
0g
14.3g
Protein
0.8g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Paleo Style Coconut Chicken and Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Paleo Style Coconut Chicken is the more energy-dense option here, packing 125 more calories per 100g than Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Paleo Style Coconut Chicken contains significantly more sugar (2.86g) compared to the milder Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth (0.41g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Paleo Style Coconut Chicken offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Paleo Style Coconut Chicken or Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth?

It depends on your goals. Paleo Style Coconut Chicken has 129 calories, while Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth has 4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Paleo Style Coconut Chicken vegan?

No, Paleo Style Coconut Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Paleo Style Coconut Chicken and Reduced Sodium Chicken Broth?

There is a difference of 125 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.