Head-to-Head Analysis

Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken vs Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken

Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn

Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
107 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
5g
Sugars
0g
2.5g
Fat
30.6g
14.3g
Protein
5.6g
1.2g
Salt
2.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken and Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken is the clear winner. With 393 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken offers a protein boost with 14.3g per 100g, outperforming Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken or Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn?

It depends on your goals. Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken has 107 calories, while Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken vegan?

No, Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Paleo Teriyaki Style Chicken and Great Value Extra Butter Popcorn?

There is a difference of 393 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.