Head-to-Head Analysis

Paletas de Coco vs Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Paletas de Coco

Paletas de Coco

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
0g
Sugars
20g
0g
Fat
30g
0g
Protein
12.5g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Paletas de Coco and Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Paletas de Coco is the clear winner. With 400 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Paletas de Coco takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts contains 20g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Paletas de Coco or Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts?

Paletas de Coco appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Paletas de Coco vegan?

No, Paletas de Coco is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Paletas de Coco and Cranberry almond + antioxidants with macadamia nuts?

There is a difference of 400 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.