Head-to-Head Analysis

Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) vs Simply tomato ketchup bottle

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Panko style coating gluten-free (30g)

Panko style coating gluten-free (30g)

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Simply tomato ketchup bottle

Simply tomato ketchup bottle

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367 kcal
Energy
88.2 kcal
0g
Sugars
23.5g
0g
Fat
0g
10g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) and Simply tomato ketchup bottle side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 279 more calories per 100g than Simply tomato ketchup bottle. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Simply tomato ketchup bottle contains 23.53g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) offers a protein boost with 10g per 100g, outperforming Simply tomato ketchup bottle in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) or Simply tomato ketchup bottle?

It depends on your goals. Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) has 367 calories, while Simply tomato ketchup bottle has 88.24 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) vegan?

No, Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Panko style coating gluten-free (30g) and Simply tomato ketchup bottle?

There is a difference of 279 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.