Head-to-Head Analysis

Pant protein blueberry banana vs Lay's Kettle Cooked Original

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Pant protein blueberry banana

Pant protein blueberry banana

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lay's Kettle Cooked Original

Lay's Kettle Cooked Original

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
75.6 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
10.2g
Sugars
0g
0.2g
Fat
0g
4g
Protein
0g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Pant protein blueberry banana and Lay's Kettle Cooked Original side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Pant protein blueberry banana is the more energy-dense option here, packing 76 more calories per 100g than Lay's Kettle Cooked Original. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Pant protein blueberry banana contains significantly more sugar (10.222222222222g) compared to the milder Lay's Kettle Cooked Original (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lay's Kettle Cooked Original is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Pant protein blueberry banana offers a protein boost with 4g per 100g, outperforming Lay's Kettle Cooked Original in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Pant protein blueberry banana or Lay's Kettle Cooked Original?

It depends on your goals. Pant protein blueberry banana has 75.555555555556 calories, while Lay's Kettle Cooked Original has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Pant protein blueberry banana vegan?

No, Pant protein blueberry banana is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Pant protein blueberry banana and Lay's Kettle Cooked Original?

There is a difference of 76 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.