Papad Pauva vs Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Papad Pauva
Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Papad Pauva and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Papad Pauva is the more energy-dense option here, packing 234 more calories per 100g than Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Papad Pauva takes the lead with only 9.67g of sugar per 100g, whereas Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy contains 46.666666666667g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Papad Pauva offers a protein boost with 6g per 100g, outperforming Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Papad Pauva or Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?
It depends on your goals. Papad Pauva has 567 calories, while Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy has 333.33333333333 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Papad Pauva vegan?
No, Papad Pauva is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Papad Pauva and Slime Licker Sour Rolling Liquid Candy?
There is a difference of 234 calories per 100g between the two products.
