Pasta vs Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Pasta
Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Pasta and Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Pasta is the clear winner. With 37 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Pasta takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices contains 27.9g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Pasta offers a protein boost with 30.4g per 100g, outperforming Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Pasta or Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices?
Pasta appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Pasta vegan?
No, Pasta is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Pasta and Trader joe's, chocolate covered banana slices?
There is a difference of 37 calories per 100g between the two products.
